Some considerations ...
more a person goes into the vision of the Semantic Web and related technologies, the greater the fascination that ... still gets some technicians in our industry look with a mixture of skepticism and disbelief on semantic technologies, although many years that scientists and many companies are investing in these areas.
A very interesting thing I've heard and seen in a video of a speech at a conference organized by the W3C:
-> link internal http://www.w3c.it -
by an employee of the research center HP in Bristol each year are invested millions of dollars on these technologies, substantial investment, no?
In reality very few projects see the light and use outside the field of research is rare (though Jena and other fruit they are, what we do without?), But we continue to invest ...
The idea is that the risks are still small compared to any successful markets are expected to crazy numbers, such as to merit so much attention ...
My own impression is that we can not do without: and so also said the inventor of all this .. the father of the Web. And even better to understand his point of view, I ordered one of his essays that tells the past and the future Web: Weaving the Web ...
-> http://www.ita-bol.com/bol/main.jsp?action=engscheda&ean=978158799018 #
just arrived and read him throw down a review.
So before we are aware of what is happening and how we can improve both the web is the way of thinking about applications, the better for all ...
I am an optimist ...
The potential is immense ... :)
Wednesday, August 4, 2004
Monday, August 2, 2004
Cervix Closed 2 Days Before Period
Blind people and elephant ...
course all this makes sense ... it 's taken from the book "Practical RDF" - http://rdf.burningbird.net/ : I would say a great book that provides a fairly practical and comprehensive' RDF universe ... I found it very interesting, though to be fully understood, the reader should already have a smattering of both the basic Semantic Web RDF.
The elephant is RDF, and we are blind people ... this is to say what is difficult to define unambiguously and global one thing that all those who use it use different aspects:)
That 's the review for Slashdot:
-> http://books.slashdot.org/books/03/09/18/0410238.shtml?tid=126&tid=188&tid=192&tid=95
here and c 'is a book review by XML.COM:
-> http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/07/30/practicalRDF.html
This is a story ... Six blind people
Were asked to identify what looked like an elephant from touch. One felt the Tusk and thought the elephant Was like a spear; Another felt the trunk thought the elephant and Was like a snake; Another felt a leg and thought Was the elephant like a tree, and so on, basing Each His definition of an elephant on His Unique Experiences.
course all this makes sense ... it 's taken from the book "Practical RDF" - http://rdf.burningbird.net/ : I would say a great book that provides a fairly practical and comprehensive' RDF universe ... I found it very interesting, though to be fully understood, the reader should already have a smattering of both the basic Semantic Web RDF.
The elephant is RDF, and we are blind people ... this is to say what is difficult to define unambiguously and global one thing that all those who use it use different aspects:)
That 's the review for Slashdot:
-> http://books.slashdot.org/books/03/09/18/0410238.shtml?tid=126&tid=188&tid=192&tid=95
here and c 'is a book review by XML.COM:
-> http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/07/30/practicalRDF.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)